However regarding local contrast TuFuse produced a more natural result while SNS-HDR obtained more texture where available, resulting a bit more unreal. The resulting image with default parameters was finished with a standard contrast curve:īoth programs respected the colours of the initial image, SNS-HDR saturating a bit. To do the automated tone mapping, several replicas of the ZN image were fed into TuFuse and SNS-HDR Lite. The resulting image histogram reveals about 13,5EV of dynamic range (the highlights peak corresponds to the tungsten lamps and their reflections): The gray tones in the following blending map indicate the source RAW used for every image area: The RAW files were optimally fused using Zero Noise. The outdoor highlights would have got blown a bit and the deep shadows would have become a bit less noisefree, but the final result would have been almost as good.
Just the central 3 shots could have been used. To capture the entire dynamic range of the scene I used 5 shots 2EV apart: I made a comparision between TuFuse with default parameters vs SNS-HDR Lite for HDR tone mapping.
0 kommentar(er)
